Tuesday, July 2, 2019

One hundred and nineteen days in the project #CriticalThinking in 365 concepts

Seventeen weeks completed. Six weeks plus six weeks of theoretical introductory work and two weeks on education followed by three weeks on energy.

By the next indexing next week we would have crossed the threshold of one third of our journey of one year. 

We are unstoppable. Next week that starts today and another week after this one shall be entrepreneurship. It's only natural that we cross from education to energy to entrepreneurship. 

Let's recall the past week:

113. Hierarchy

114. Gangrene

115. Torrent _or_ Recovering

116. Fish _or_ Warm Body Pets, or discussing the Paradox of Value

117. Harness adversity

118. Time and energy

119. Chain link
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6551481014500286464

I am certain few of us thought either three weeks ago or seventeen weeks ago that (1) gangrene is an energy related concept, or that (2) we would have introduced before one third of the year three principles of thermodynamics without even naming them so.

We are left with showcasing how the homework for number 115 was supposed to be done. We promise we've done it. The quote after we finished an early draft was:

"All of your connections are far fetched, and I know you. How do you expect anyone else to make those?"

and my answer was of course:

"I actually don't expect anyone to make those same connections. That is how I'd do it. Everyone can do their own reasoning why torrent fits here best, or not, or why recovering fits better or not. The harnessing fear of a torrent and taming its energy instead is just my take at the question. Everyone can find, I am sure, much better ways to answer than my own."

Naturally, the goal remains that we can take any concept or situation needing analysis—this last week it was energy—, and we can select a fitted set of prior introduced concepts to bombard it with so that we delve deeper into understanding its intricacies and connections, systemically internal and external alike. 

To think, and to think well, may be considered by all of us as being the same as vicariously playing the greatest ever Super bowl or World Cup soccer game right down in the field along with Peyton Manning or Gheorghe Hagi while sitting in the easy chair and watching them play and shouting "go go go," but trust me: it's not. Nothing beats standing up and getting into the field to play and actually _become_ like Manning or Hagi of good thinking ourselves. 

Merely listening to another's argument, then either criticizing, or better yet appropriating that someone else's thinking and calling it our own doesn't make it our own. Nor does it make us thinkers. Actually training for it and then playing the game of better thinking is what makes us players in the game. Try it. The feeling and the power are mesmerizing!;) There's absolutely nothing else like it. Think about it: self induced high without either the costs or risks of running into trouble with police or anyone. 

Then again, maybe one of these days we'll have to answer questions when applying for positions that would sound like "Have you been thinking? If offered employment do you agree to subject yourself to a test to verify that you have not been thinking illegal thoughts?"

THINK.
It's not illegal yet.

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.
InnovationTrek
ASPetrescu@alumni.pitt.edu
ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

Monday, June 24, 2019

Tuesday, June 18, 2019

One hundred and five days in the project #CriticalThinking in 365 concepts

We are now addressing the second policy issue area—energy—in our applied critical thinking quest. This first week we started with a duality, or even multiplicity, of interpretations possible of the term energy itself. As we can see we are taking full advantage of our understanding that specialization of our knowledge quest may often lead to allowing some questions to escape unanswered and possibly fall through our fingers. Otherwise how else can  we justify that blinded (by the Sun), Panda Bear, parenthood, or Water Cycle in nature and Hybrid between Access and Control all have a strong logical connection to energy? Of course they do—if we are ready to see it and analyze each such connection (and many more of them) fully. 

A week full of surprises, as well as thinking and connecting homework that was not even expressly specified. By now we all recognize nonetheless how important answering our questions is and how many more questions form in our mind after we've answered the ones we list here. 

It goes without saying that the example included herein can also be used with addressing energy. Similarly, some issues we addressed with treating education would just naturally transfer over to how we handle analysis here with the energy systems as well. 

98 bis. Bonus example to education—bitcoin, blockchain, and e-commerce law and cyber security too, can all be addressed quite well with our framework of analysis.

99. Energy

100. Hybrid process—Hybrid Access Control

101. Flows and Stores

102. Blinded (by the Sun)

103. Panda Bear

104. Parenthood 

105. Photosynthesis 
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6546393555739430912

This week we really stretched our demands on our minds and hearts and souls alike. The connections made and left to be made are simply so so many. All too many to list learning objectives here after all. Good applied thinking to be useful and used in any situation is the standing learning objective! That may require self-defining the operational learning objectives by the reader! But we figured this out by now. 

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.
InnovationTrek

Monday, June 10, 2019

Ninety-eight days in the project #CriticalThinking in 365 concepts

I hope y'all saw what we've done here together. 

#CommonSenseUniversity
#SwissArmyKnifeThinking

Knowledge seeking is only good—read successful as it leads to discovery—if it gets applied. 

Put on other words, as they say, _the best practice is a good theory_. If we discovered one. And if we use it. For good. 

The last few concepts intentionally set us up for applying what we've seen before. I didn't ask the final questions and obviously I haven't given any answers either. That is obviously up to you. Hint. Part of the answers may come from a pretty well known case in American business jurisprudence. 

I was having a conversation the other day with a fresh graduate of a really good graduate school of business—at University of Michigan. To my surprise and disappointment he had never read Dodge v Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668. Here:


To my enchantment he was speaking and planning his future impact of the world as if he was quoting Ford's own defense in that same case—the part on which Ford lost back then. 

Maybe we learned to change things since. Did we? 

That's homework at the end of this week, fourteen, and at the end of our education system analysis case study. I'd be willing to comment on any submissions to me in answer to the above question and to any self-designed questions you may come up with as a result of applying our techniques from weeks 1-12 to the case at hand of weeks 13 and 14. Answers are always free for the asking. 

The week in review:

92. Hybrid actor—Hybrid Learner Teacher (HLT)

93. Hybrid actor—Hybrid Asset Proprietor (HAP)

94. Expertise-Burden

95. Break

96. Serendipity 

96 bis. Bonus on serendipity and constructal law finder, or founder

97. Hybrid actor—Hybrid Knowledge Adopter-Seeker (HKA-S)

98. Lifelong embrace
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6543828681624739840

Note the subtle differences between 92. and 97. It's a matter of role and dynamics too. They go hand in hand, of course, but they are clearly distinct. 

Shall we self congratulate for having addressed in a thorough way the issues of education in the world? Of course. Steady does it. 100 concepts (with the two bonuses.) Here. Founder of America's public education would be proud!



On to next issue area next week. Stay tuned. 

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.
InnovationTrek

Monday, June 3, 2019

Ninety-one days in the project #CriticalThinking in 365 concepts

We are now addressing the first policy issue area—education—as a case study to see how to use in practice the framework we are building. We completed the first of two weeks looking at this most important of all case study. 

Suffice it to say: your heart skips a beat a second—>you go to the heart doctor and trust her with her advise. You don't listen to some TV or twitter pundit telling you that your heart is fine and all you need to do is to trust the President or his opponents, and all will be fine. Or do you?;)

Let's recapitulate the seven concepts for the week:

85. Education 

86. Escape

87. Systemic Environment 

88. Autoregression 

89. Experience 

90. Stereotype 

91. Specialization—Fragmentation 
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6541289230503591936

As a reminder we said we'll spend two weeks on addressing education, and we have a standing homework to bombard the education system with concepts for analysis in a similar way with my addressing accountability earlier on as an example of applying the framework. 

We can already see a partial system map for education, can we not? What does it tell us?

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.
InnovationTrek

Monday, May 27, 2019

Eighty-four days in the project #CriticalThinking in 365 concepts

"Should we save Homo Sapiens?"


Let's get out there and start thinking! Before it's too late.

78. Untold story

79. Mental experiment

80. Core Defining Variable (CDV)

81. Blend

82. Paradigm

83. Storytelling 

84. Canvas 
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6538795253200142336

Nobody and nothing can replace the power of an educated citizenry. 

All too many can steal away the individual rights of folks who refuse themselves the right to think. Don't let it happen to you. 

#CommonSenseUniversity
#SwissArmyKnifeThinking

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.
InnovationTrek

Monday, May 20, 2019

Seventy-seven days in the project #CriticalThinking in 365 concepts

We reached the end of week eleven. First week that had some serious analyses assigned. Rightly so as we started actually utilizing the concepts for bombarding practical questions with them. 

71. Proactive 

72. Nurtured Arrogant Incompetence (NAI)

73. Dogma 

74. Universal Application 

75. Training 

76. Self-recursive 

77. Resilience 
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6536245703574908928

This past week we made a list of things we want analyzed and explained, and we started making a list of concepts to bombard a chosen issue with—accountability. Or whatever readers chose as their own issues to address. We have a method to make a recipe and an example of an actual product... 



Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.
InnovationTrek