“we don’t need no education.”

United States of America did well all these years without an "official" language. Lingua franca across the country and the world, by organic adoption, beats any other means possible—especially the not very democratic executive order tool—to have something be in language use. 

I recall a time when neighbors to the East of where I was back then decided to include in a Constitution words to mean "the official language of the Republic of Moldova is Moldovan." The provision over time led to massive protests and a democratic taking down of the government and political party that was so badly informed and ill intended as to wield their temporary power of the state to put that idiotic statement in a Constitution. Obviously there is no and there has never been a Moldovan language. This was a propagandistic attempt by a moldovan post-Soviet elite group in power at rewriting history as to wipe out the Romanian language away from the people's attention and to distract away from the people's convictions about the Republic of Moldova's unity in heart and soul and history with sister country Romania. The youth of that country took down the government democratically of course in reaction to terrible policies and really bad deeds by the state but the spark & the unifying factor that fueled the movement was that "Moldovan language" lie put into the Constitution.

One must be very careful with words. They have powers that by far exceed the power of only people.

Think about it for a second. Does the United States need an official language _decreed by executive order_—a highly undemocratic ruling device that is hardly ever recognized as representing the will of the people governed—and named English? What actual good will that do? Something that is not happening already? 

I for one will just start speaking French much more often. Why not? 

We will start a French language critical thinking learning channel. 

We will start a learn Dutch for everyone weekly podcast. 

We will host a Romanian language and literature monthly workshop both in person and online.

We will also be continuing to host Dari/Farsi/Persian based career development and entrepreneurship sessions for learners who are our neighbors. It turns out in one language you say _shower_. In another you say _douche_. Written with different letters than the Latin alphabet yet the words are different. Coming from British influence or French influence, but Persian language didn't actually have a word (that is still remembered).

Let's stay careful out there. I like John Oliver a lot. He's been helping me live a happier life. I've been watching BBC for a long time. I've been laughing and learning baking and so much more. Do I want though these personal preferences of mine for a really good comedian or good TV to become translated into an "official language" of the United States of America?

In our house we host parties. Ten languages can be spoken at one time. Imagine some neighbor listening in and calling the police to arrest us all, for that neighbor's total lack of understanding of the Bill of Rights and the (First and) Fourth Amendments.

Let's not make any more dumb mistakes in government. They are quite costly. Some can turn deadly. To individuals but also to political careers.

Remember Meyer v Nebraska. 1923. 

Adrian kf0ohs S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

a few reasons why it is misleading to say “run government like a business”

After the terrible Challenger disaster someone asked an engineer during a Senate hearing "you mean an o-ring?". we need a Richard P Feynman great explainer for everything. 

 the argument has been made so many times that I cannot count them all. yet, is it a good one: can government be "run like a business"?

governments cannot simply be "run like a business" because businesses never have the full ability to do what governments can and must do. medium and long term strategic effective management of resources for everyone's benefit. think of the space program. dams and hydroelectric power plants. electrifying entire remote states. the railroad. the interstate system. clean air and clean water. maintaining the country's natural environment—trees make oxygen in this world, and we cannot live without it. first and foremost, flow of capital and sovereign debt in a nationally backed currency. backed with national reputation and power. including military and diplomatic plus of course economic benefits of interacting with us in mutually beneficial commerce. things the President's businesses have all benefitted for and yet rarely paid for in full. true of all businesses. including those by the President's special first buddy ❌🐦, or a lot of those others who helped elect the President. 

businesses always rely on governments to externalize plenty of necessary resources to run the business that the business doesn't need to pay for and which do not need to be listed on balance sheets. businesses in the same field may seem to compete with others in the same field and yet they all cooperate more than meets the eye to hold consumers dependent on all those de facto "monopolies"—think of the "Rockefeller-Ford+ matrix"—our dependence on the automobile. similarly the "information disinformation ecosystem." what brand you're paying for is totally irrelevant as long as you're paying for the product that is you—you're attention to stay dependent and in the game. the game now is the North Klownistan Show. but that's not everything. and it's certainly not all that new either. after all the Romans came up with "bread and circus" and it's worked so well for them that even after the dismantling of their empire several other baby-empires, including this one, have been following suit. 

in contrast we must expect our government to equalize the plainfield for _and by_ everyone. the government must deliver _to everyone_ fundamentally things guaranteed in the US Declaration of Independence. it cannot and it should not be allowed to say "yes, we do that but simply not for you!" whoever the you is. whatever the that is. as long as we recognize it—that—as a right and duty that the government is in charge with helping with. here rests the massive burden of selection. the Reagan government never intended to solve the homeless crisis—it may have in much part created, or at least helped create, or failed to avert—because philosophically it never agreed that it had anything to do with people's ability to find and pay for shelter. think about it. the FDR elections were won in part by saying that the Hoover administration created the Hoover-viles problem. which of course President Hoover did not create. businesses allowed to happen with the 1929 stock crash. one that President Hoover has tried his best to avert. yet to no avail. it didn't bother President FDR to place blame where it was not for political capital gain. then he, FDR, turned the country "saving capitalism from itself" by doing something no business alone no matter how large could have done. hiring the unemployed for national projects of significance to the entire country but for which nobody alone would have paid for individually. I take weekly hikes to this day on trails made by FDR's conservation corps. 

he—FDR, like President Teddy Roosevelt before him—in a sense did run government like a _meta business_. meaning like a business of many supra-businesses, recognizing together that each person is a contributor in many ways to that meta business. without life and liberty there cannot be pursuit of happiness. without all three and more the meta business of our nation can but only die a slow but steady and certain death. to put it simply: computers and robots neither buy products and services nor pay taxes. 

one lesson that for all his errors of judgement and positions, Henry Ford understood thoroughly: his workers had to also be able to afford to be his customers _and_ needed a place or more to go to with his vehicles and those places were national parks. where the railroads were also taking their customers, and where the same railroads were building cabins and internal roads and operations to make it appealing for folks to go. recall that in basic economics the human capital must _rest_ to replenish itself for tomorrow. all too often "run like a business" meant discarding the human capital at a slow but steady rate, or all too often instantaneously, called death, otherwise, and replacing it with new one, as opposed to minding the one in front of you. as terrible as it may sound it is real that the Gilded Age was built with dead people. if we don't spell it out we may just miss the essence. we don't want that kind of "run like a business"—coded in Lockner v New York (1905), and no longer good law—anymore. 

recall that government is in part there to help protect all of the people from being overworked and underpaid to death. because some "business" simply can't see past their own massively consequential mistakes from ignorance. 

Adrian kf0ohs S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

Q & A from 16 years ago when platforms were about community of knowledge

let me know if you have questions. would love to help out. still. always. forever.

Adrian S. Petrescu, J.D., Ph.D.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org (office)

http://www.linkedin.com/in/aspetrescu 

"I have learned the novice can often see things that the expert overlooks. All that is necessary is to not be afraid of making mistakes or appearing naive." Abraham Maslow (1908-70) 

"My country is the world and my religion is to do good." (Thomas Paine, 1736-7, 1809)

"Cogito, ergo sum" (Rene Descartes, 1596-1650) 

"Who is John Galt?"

Think freely 0.0: you must learn critical thinking from before you were even born!

We are in the business of tricking the mind…

…be careful how you use your mind because if you don't, somebody else will!

Adrian kf0ohs S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

Oldie but goodie: Get my children's soccer field [playground] out from under your Government's dirt hill [or red tape], or we'll sue you into oblivion! Do it!

The Trial of the Century, 2037–Remembering about the Future.

Seven years passed. Anything positive actually happened? Sure we got Yates. But that was us. Not the government, as the government (in part, but thankfully not the elected folks!) insisted still that they knew better than us. Let's keep the momentum and grow everything still exponentially to the entire country and the world. 

Do we know how to ask all the _questions that matter_? And care to work our hardest to make the good answers become reality?

A short while ago in a meeting of many colleagues, all of us charged with moving innovation forward at accelerated pace for the entire country mostly, and beyond, I dared make the comparison of all these recently springing up like mushrooms after the rain A"I" tools with a, well, hammer 🔨.

A few (whom I heard, so I can't tell who or how many colleagues believed what if they didn't choose to speak up) criticized the comparison as unfit due to the "different" nature of the tools in question helping our brains achieve tasks better and faster. No one truly delved deep enough on the full meaning of "different." 

Yet: I'm at my core a sensing and thinking human, dad, and a manufacturing engineer. In my own cognitive impairment the comparison makes sense. One must listen in to get what's going on with the comparison. Take a person who's never used a hammer to straighten bent (sheet) metal. Their use of the tool is most certainly unproductive and could be likely even quite dangerous. A tool in the untrained, or maybe even evil, hands is not just useless but can't escape from being (highly) dangerous despite all of its otherwise great utility. Yes, to false equivalency to a point. Costs of competing dumb 🦜s are much higher than of mere helping hammers or the like. But what about benefits? Doing "faster" (and not so well, either) those things that may not need be done at all? Hm. Be weary of the efficiency of the all too dumb. Fight it, even: ♥️&🧠.

Context is everything…

We ought to remember that we are spending hundreds of $ billions on false pretend artificial « intelligence » to make ever larger profits despite human capital needs & quite countering proactively nurturing and use of own actual intelligence, and $ trillions a year on weapon systems to keep peace by deterrence.

I hear there is someone who's running for vice-president of the United States on a platform about "professors are the enemy." This seems so 2400+ years ago from the times of Socrates. Wow. Just wow. He said it. Yes, I am his arch enemy. For life. We all are. We—all parents—must remind everyone that our government works for us. That all of our government _working for us_ means that we—all parents—aren't resting shy from defining the agenda. Our children matter. We're fighting for this every step of the way. With all we've got.

Over the past 30+ years I've been in the US working in education and education policy I have yet to see a local, state & national _full commitment_ to always providing playgrounds to youth in our schools.  Don't bother ask any LLM as it'll just confirm that. Add Deming's cafeteria, maybe, & see where you're getting. But who's fully ready to actually not just ask but to truly act swiftly about it?

We wrote The Trial of the Century 2037 seven years ago. Replace soccer field with playground and hill with all schools & parks. 🧛‍♂️

My Independence Day wish to the world, now more than ever!

📜🔔🇺🇸❤️🕊️🌎🌍🌏

Happy Independence (including most importantly of thought) Day! 

Adrian kf0ohs S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

How you ask essential simple questions changes everything!

Adrian kf0ohs S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

InnovationTrek

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org (office)

ASPetrescu@alumni.pitt.edu (private)

http://www.linkedin.com/in/aspetrescu 

"I have learned the novice can often see things that the expert overlooks. All that is necessary is to not be afraid of making mistakes or appearing naive." Abraham Maslow (1908-70)

"Cogito, ergo sum" (Rene Descartes, 1596-1650) 

"Who is John Galt?"