Brands and their value over time.

Let's remember homo sapiens believes in stories. Strongly so. Maybe much too strongly so. 

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7000500231494602752?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

InnovationTrek

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org (office)

ASPetrescu@alumni.pitt.edu (private)

http://www.linkedin.com/in/aspetrescu 

"I have learned the novice can often see things that the expert overlooks. All that is necessary is to not be afraid of making mistakes or appearing naive." Abraham Maslow (1908-70)

"Cogito, ergo sum" (Rene Descartes, 1596-1650) 

"Who is John Galt?"

SEAT robots pictures.

Download full resolution images

Available until Oct 28, 2022

Knowledge is a basket of blueberries

#Count [11]

 #Count _correct_ units of analysis. Don't get bogged by incorrect ones.

Take an EV company. Is current US market share in EVs sold by each company the correct unit of analysis? It's obviously a time & space particularized slice. Will this enable you to learn & predict what may happen in ten years? In twenty? Globally, not just in the US?

Capacity? History? Bold vision and a strong past demonstrated track record to implement it, in prior similar instances? Easy, once we see it. How does choosing the incorrect unit of analysis impact predictive power and accuracy?

Take further any wannabe elected official. When running in their first election we can look at campaign statements. That may not be as reliable a measure as one would ever wish for.

It may get slightly better when they run for re-election: we can look at their voting record. Is _that_ sufficient now, though? 

Is it the same as when we choose the elected official to be the US President? For example, President Lyndon Baynes Johnson. In his own words—in an interview after his Presidency—prior to being President he had not enough power to do what he had to do. Albeit he actually had and used quite some power. How then would we determine anything at the time of his election for VP alongside President John F Kennedy, before the latter's tragic death that led to the former becoming President? Could it be bold initiatives accomplished? Or,  maybe bold initiatives _attempted_?

Given more power, would it not help to know how many initiatives attempted there were earlier, as a likely better predictor of what will the power be used for once it'll be there?

This way one will then better train a model of decision making for use later on deductive predictions for daily decisions that may be made by or impact us all. 

Wouldn't you want to predict better from past behaviors of your date how will s/he react once s/he'll turn a spouse when deciding about purchasing a vehicle or home or about having children or who will raise them and how and where will they go to school and what they'll get a chance at becoming in their lives? All decisions likely possibly made better and which in turn in their massive aggregate may lead to humankind achievements of much larger scale. Or failure of much larger "grandeur." And certainly to both, only hopefully at different times and more of the former and less of the latter. 

Is it feasible that one can imagine a world whereby decisions are always intuitively taken better because we learned to understand better how we make decisions and what motivates most of us to make them most often? Even without fully understanding all the mathematics behind it. The way we drive an automobile, better or not so well, without knowing much about the thermodynamics of an internal combustion engine. We could improve by measuring better. (Let's remember, Campbell's Law may simply work both ways. Once you know you can and must proactively compensate for its work.)

In memory of Donald T Campbell and Paul Y Hammond.🙏

Follow in the footsteps of the great.

Look inside.

Repeat.

[11]

https://youtu.be/xlm_cQwc-9M

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [10]

#Count _all_ the (wannabe) Emperors with "new clothes." It may not be that self evident.

I am thorn: how much should we show how it's done? how much should we let you analyze thoroughly yourself?

Take a CEO of a large EV car company. Measure the influence he has, from his own companies' stock to other unrelated topics, always of importance. He's done some good, and even some great, work. Yet, the outlandish statements and the attempts to lend credibility to himself from fame and richness on issues of no expertise whatsoever are easily tricking a lot of unsuspecting people. 

Take further any other similar attempts. Those most of us barely ever actually see through. Whether a politician says to a few doctors in a televised live show from the White House "if you could try to put the light or disinfectant inside the body" or whether a podcaster pretends to be merely asking questions of "experts," the techniques are all at least as old as when the Mayor (whose name we don't remember) had Socrates poisoned "democratically" for helping youth learn how to think. 

The task may seem daunting, at first, but with training and perseverance you may get better and better at it. 

One great explains it with these simple words:

 "everyone has a _hidden_ agenda." 

Yes. Everyone. All the time. There are no exceptions. 

Dedicated to the memory of Donald T Campbell and Paul H Hammond.🙏

Follow in the footsteps of the great. 

Look inside. 

Repeat. 

[10]

https://youtu.be/Y4y2e4rUxfo

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [9]

#Count all the false dichotomies. Move proactively through them, to solutions.

Yesterday I had the honor to hold the third and last section of a class on Our Earth in Space. using Science on a Sphere, and focusing this time on the major achievement of humankind that is James Webb Space Telescope, its perfect launch on Christmas last year, 53 years after Apollo 8, its reaching four days ago its final destination at Lagrange 2 point 1.5 million kilometers away from the dark side of Earth, on its amazing technology including a cryogenic machine ensuring temperatures of about just 6 Kelvin, and on its ongoing shields and instruments deployment schedule and on its plans to discovery of questions it asks and seeks answers to. 🌞🌏🚀🌗🛰🪐💫💧

Imagine my surprise to learn that learners in our group—adults interested in space exploration—, who in the beginning of the class correctly interpreted Sir Isaac Newton's 1687 originating gravitation law, have never heard of Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions, nor of the 232 years that passed from then until the 1919 Sir Edington experiments with a Solar Eclipse, proving Albert Einstein correct, dethroned Isaac Newton from being founding "king of Physics". To say nothing about Count de Broglie's work, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle or Schroedinger's cat. We ought to do better at designing and implementing education in our world. 

There is no better feeling than to see the curious eyes of folks learning something new to them that they could've and should've known long time ago. Life is good. Make every day a good day!

Asks us questions on construcral law and particularly on its application to human systems.👇

In memory of Donald T. Campbell and Paul Y Hammond. 🙏

Follow in the footsteps of the great. 

Look inside. 

Repeat. 

[9]

https://youtu.be/jc8_8ccXuS0

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [8]

#Count _everything_ you can be inspired by. This addresses directly how to define _great_.

One of the hardest, yet most important, lessons ever learned.

"Eu nu ți-aș dori vreodată să ajungi să ne cunoști."

[A more complete quote:

"- … Şi, purtat de biruinţă, să mă-mpiedec de-un moşneag? 

- De-un moşneag, da, împărate, căci moşneagul ce priveşti

Nu e om de rând, el este domnul Ţării Româneşti. 

Eu nu ţi-aş dori vrodată să ajungi să ne cunoşti, 

Nici ca Dunărea să-nece spumegând a tale oşti. 

După vremuri mulţi veniră, începând cu acel oaspe, 

Ce din vechi se pomeneşte, cu Dariu a lui Istaspe;

Mulţi durară, după vremuri, peste Dunăre vrun pod, 

De-au trecut cu spaima lumii şi mulţime de norod;

Împăraţi pe care lumea nu putea să-i mai încapă

Au venit şi-n ţara noastră de-au cerut pământ şi apă -

Şi nu voi ca să mă laud, nici că voi să te-nspăimânt, 

Cum veniră, se fă*ă toţi o apă ş-un pământ. 

Te făleşti că înainte-ţi răsturnat-ai valvârtej

Oştile leite-n zale de-mpăraţi şi de viteji? 

Tu te lauzi că Apusul înainte ţi s-a pus?... 

Ce-i mâna pe ei în luptă, ce-au voit acel Apus? 

Laurii voiau să-i smulgă de pe funtea ta de fier, 

A credinţei biruinţă căta orice cavaler. 

Eu? Îmi apăr sărăcia şi nevoile şi neamul... 

Şi de-aceea _tot ce mişcă-n ţara asta, râul, ramul_, 

Mi-e prieten numai mie, iară ţie duşman este, 

Duşmănit vei fi de toate, făr-a prinde chiar de veste;

N-avem oşti, dară iubirea de moşie e un zid

Care nu se-nfiorează de-a ta faimă, Baiazid!"—Mihai Eminescu, Scrisoarea a treia.]

This here and now is betting on our unfair advantage in the world. As Free Dacians. (Born and taught in Romanian—at least partially, if lucky enough in this world—, and hence able to read or hear and comprehend in the Romanian language.) 

It is quite a select club, us knowers of the Romanian language. As I suggested earlier, I _had to_ get to Texas. When I got there, a fine gentleman told me he self taught himself (sufficient) Romanian to be able to read Mihai Eminescu. The brilliant words spoken just for here and now in our #️⃣🧛‍♂️ series are included. In comments you'll find a link to the written translation into English—yet it's never the same thing. 

The science of why this matters—constructal law—follows tomorrow (at [9]). 

In memory of Donald T Campbell and Paul Y Hammond. 🙏

Follow in the footsteps of the great. 

Look inside. 

Repeat. 

[8]

https://youtu.be/69JnrqZvd0k

Mihai Eminescu—Scrisoarea a treia. 

Romanian language.

https://m.versuri.ro/versuri/mihai-eminescu-scrisoarea-iii-_h617.html

English translation.

Letter III - excerpt [Scrisoarea III - fragment]

"There! A peace envoy is coming with a kerchief on a stick Bayezid, watching him closely, a fierce quarrel wants to pick:

– What'd you want?

– We? Peace and quiet! And if you are not hostile

Our prince would like to chatter with Your Highness for a while.

At a sign, they let him enter and draws near, the tent to reach,

An old man dressed in plain garments, with a simple lovely speech.

– Are you Mircea?

– Yes, Your Highness!

– I demand you to kneel down,

Or I'll lay upon your forehead a disgraceful thorny crown.

– I don't really mind, Your Highness, why you've come and what you do, While we are at peace, however, I shall warmly welcome you. [...]"

Further, here (pp. 57-59):

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354311216_Mihai_Eminescu_-_50_Poems_Translated_into_English_by_Octavian_Cocos

We take the opportunity to introduce the reader to even more MIhai Eminescu, in English. Enjoy.

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [7]

#Count impact of flows. 

In preparation of the constructal law part. Let's watch the work of natural flows on the planet.

In memory of Donald T Campbell and Paul Y Hammond. 🙏

Follow in the footsteps of the great. 

Look inside. 

Repeat. 

[7]

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aspetrescu_count-activity-6892332480188231680-Vk4k

(we include the link above so that the video presenting flows on the planet shows)

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [6]

#Count who's with you and your story. Count who's not. Help get the latter to join the former, in their interest, with the least energy consumed by you.

"Everything happens for a reason." 

(It took me a long time to hear it. It was in South Texas, some 18 years ago, as I had just landed for the interview for my first full time tenure track professor and director position, the one that helped build the case for my later becoming a U.S. Citizen. Note yesterday's [5] question. This is in part a case study on how that counting should be done.)

Life is indeed a Ponzi scheme. The world is clearly one too. Yet: good news is there is not just one Ponzi scheme. But plenty!

Choose the Ponzi schemes you're a part of. Design and run _your own_ all positive all life and world changing Ponzi schemes. Make everyone participate in these great schemes & abandon the nasty ones they've been believing in (erroneously!) for far too long. 

I _had to_ get to Texas. I had to learn Texas, to know it in some depth, to live it and to love it, to meet everyone I met and have been influenced by there, to make new amazing lifelong friends, to run into My Dear Bride, of course, but most of all, to _learn to proactively dismantle stereotypes_. 

I had to get to Texas, in 2004, it turns out, because when I was a teenager my parents brought me (from Hungary, of all places) a University of Texas branded T-shirt. What a courageous crazy thing, in retrospect, to wear that in the late 1970s, early 1980s, România. Notice how _I believed that story_, in spite of everything surrounding me telling me I shouldn't have. Notice how stereotypical views of Texas hit me in both positive (University of Texas brand & lure, Texas Instruments) and negative (politics & more) ways over time. Notice how some stories have endurance in our minds, if subconsciously so. Notice how learning to dismantle stereotypes is about people. It is about interacting with, learning to know, & trusting people. Day in and day out. (More about this later in our own 6D model—always go slow, and you'll learn much more.)

At first I thought about it—the sentence above—in the context I was in the middle of back then. (Suffice it to say I had to learn that moving was going to matter a lot.) But there was so much more to the lesson. As you can see here and now. The great thing about good lessons is that once learned they stay with you.

"When you'll get it [the doctoral degree], you'll know that it's just the ticket to get you into the ballroom. What you'll do on the dance floor is what matters."

My lady mentor of 28 years & dissertation co-chair couldn't have framed it better.

Take _it_ to mean _your own learning_ of what matters. _To build an ability & to have a desire to make a difference._

Let's watch systems thinking. Ask _your own questions_. We can answer some together if you list them below.👇

In memory of Donald T Campbell and Paul Y Hammond.🙏

Follow in the footsteps of the great.

Look inside.

Repeat.

[6]

https://youtu.be/EbLh7rZ3rhU

I don't have proof of this but I believe strongly that this is the book Russell Ackoff speaks about in his first sentence in his talk above. 

Please note that there is someone relatively (wannabe) famous in these parts of the world who is (should never) formally connected with (and hence know about) Russell Ackoff more than he ever shows. 

We know that from the misters person's much too immodest behavior and much too influential ill reasoning. Who do you think the person is? What can be done to curb said sad trend—that all too many listen to erroneously gathered false fame?

Please _also_ note that yesterday I told the story of how Russell Ackoff helped solve inner city Philadelphia "learning to read by attracting folks to watch Charlie Chaplin old no-sound movies" in the context of making that part of Yates, then Yates Nebraska, and then Yates USA. 

I told it on the way to testifying to the Nebraska Legislature to someone who helped me watch The Goonies in my 50s. 

We'll make this happen, from here in Gifford Park, to the entire country and the world. Let me know if you want to help. Thank you. 

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [5]

#Count who contributed to, and all that had to align, for you to read this today, here and now. 

Next, #️⃣🧛‍♂️count lives ahead which you will impact into the future. Make it all a good impact. Better yet, make it _the best_ impact.

Use the power of the exponential curve.📈

Once you tell a good story into the future to another, they buy it, & you don't mind the credit, there are now two of you telling that story to the world.

I imagine a world where _energy independence is of the individual_, and hybrid. Not national, monopolistic, of the fossil fuels quasi-monopolies or of the renewable energy industries quasi-monopolies. Rather, a _hybrid_ at global scale, focused on the/each individual human being, whereby we can all (yes, that's 7.9 billion all) get and use a fair share of the sun's energy.

Who can argue that in the broad scheme of things the world was intended for a bird—accessing enough energy as to keep it alive and travel across the world if so its species is meant to do—is supposed to be better off than a thinking human? That a thinking human must be relegated to lesser than the panda bear—whose life is always dedicated mostly just to eating, as its food energy density is very low—in terms of that human's ability to be just like any other human, and access enough energy to survive a _human_ life? (Many folks will argue it, but they'd be logically afailing.)

Notice how the issues are never only what someone else, with an interest to distract you, tells you they are. In any system simply doing its job at working as a system, you must get to the root of understanding how the system functions before you can safely do anything to impact it. On this planet all energy comes from the sun. Yet, some will use more of it in their daily life. Some will use much less. Much much less. It's not just _how much_ energy. But how much packed _energy density_ is being used, by everyone, and what is the distribution across "all everyones".

Once we get that economics is physics, and all that actually means, it will make much much more sense. 

"Today" [5] (was supposed to be Monday) we watch _the power of the exponential curve_. It is shown here to show _the size_ of the issue, so that we grasp later, "tomorrow," the need for proportionally responding to that size of the issue.

Anticipatedly "tomorrow" [6] we'll watch _systemic thinking_ and "the day after tomorrow," which is actually today [7], we'll watch the power of constructal law in connection to Voltera S-curves, which we've been studying for over four decades.

Yesterday serendipity had it that we went to testify on #Yates at the Nebraska Capitol. Three minutes are short, so I was brief. I could not fit in «I heard President Reagan's siren call I heard live, saying "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." and I came to Nebraska as fast as I could.»

In memory of Donald T Campbell and Paul Y Hammond. 🙏

Follow in the footsteps of the great.

Look inside.

Repeat.

[5]

https://youtu.be/O133ppiVnWY

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [4]

#Count the tasks on your back. Shake them all off—into the water. _Make them_ water.

_Tell a better story. Let it grow._

A Great said "If someone else can do it, let them. Otherwise, get busy." Brilliant. 

We're told a story all life growing up that stuff is _our_ job. Learning new things. Doing house work in the family to make life work. When our turn comes, raising our youth. All correct. All true. All important. 

Yet: after a while you grow. Your job grows—it grows much larger than one person can do alone anymore. When that moment comes you can no longer do _your_ job all alone. A team must do it. An ever growing team of teams. You're a storyteller now. You most do your job as storyteller. You must help folks follow and build inspiring stories in the future that you can help them have the courage and resolve to build for themselves.

Changing the world requires a proportional response to the size of the task at hand. (What many call "being a bigger hammer."—was originally bring, but we'll go with autocorrect this one time.) 

If the world is stone, you can't carry water to it with a pale, all by yourself. You must bring about quite a few storms and hurricanes to do what _you_ have to do to get the job done. #️⃣🧛‍♂️💨⛈🌊🌍

[We are late by one day. Sunday. We were busy applying our own strategic advise. 5 nationalities. 4 people. 3 continents and 3 young age groups. 2 years+. 1 great idea and plan for what's next. _Yates Global_ is born. 

Watch carefully. Think. Well, count. How many years did it take, how many miles around the globe it took, for the story in the making in the picture to get here, so that it can advance from here everywhere ahead?

Don't you wish to know the "secret sauce" that we're hiding in the iPad?

Ask us👇and we might even tell. Can you recognize every place in the picture? Why do you feel they're chosen here?]

Dedicated to the memory of Donald T Campbell and Paul Y Hammond. 🙏

Follow in the footsteps of the great.

Look inside. 

Repeat.

[4]

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [3]

#Count #️⃣🧛‍♂️ how many _stories_ you believe. How many are true?

Yet, you have no real data to verify most of those stories. Nor any easily available means to gather such data if you don't have it handy, to verify its accuracy and validity, and to ensure that the stories as told are backed up by data showing them as valid.

Some are obvious. Santa Claus, anyone?

Others are not so obvious.

Crime is up. Or down.

Is it, really, or did we just issue and count more, or less, police reports? What then is up? Or down? Crime, or police reporting?

Did police seek more crime because doing so will mean a raise? Or did they seek less as they were more comfortable eating donuts and less inclined to work the streets as hard?

Were crimes reported harder to find and report or (much) less hard to find and report than crimes that were actually not found and reported? Which crime is then up? Or down? The harsher crimes? Or the lesser crimes?

(Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani was famous for being successful at reducing crime. Except the reduction started a few years before he took office and correlated with and was likely caused by something totally different than the election of Rudy—check with Freakonomics, by Lewitt and Dubner, as they tell the story and actual counter story extremely well.)

Then let's imagine _all_ the stories that we just believe, or held to be true and still do, all our life so far and we want to keep holding true ahead for the future. This is much more serious than it may seem at first sight to the untrained eye.

Take property rights. They're actually _reduced_, not protected, by HOAs. Of course they are reduced. What were you thinking? Ask Bob Yapp.👇

Brands are cool. Of course. Believe that. We've been conditioned that way almost forever. Offer them all free advertising at your own expense, even though you may not own stock in them (yet). This is a hard one to at least count, let alone reduce further unnecessary damage. It's even worse when counting for a teenager you may have at home. Uniforms in schools may solve the issue somewhat, but let's not count on it too much. It's controversial.

Hard work pays off. Of course it does. This is true. But it's not as self evident as it may seem at first sight. Story with college is incomplete, and by far imperfect, if student loans were the price you paid for that success. Depending of field and how long it took for a degree or more, repaying loans may take away your chance at joining early enough the ranks of believers in the American dream story of home ownership, for example.

What do you mean, _story_ of home ownership? Bank owns a home until mortgage is fully paid off. You knew that. Put this story on the list. Because we believe that a home is a wealth creation vehicle. _It depends_.

Got my personalized ticket. I'm off to Cartwheel Galaxy. See y'all.😎

Dedicated to the memory of Donald T Campbell and Paul Y Hammond. Thank you.

Follow in the footsteps of the great.

Look inside. 

Repeat. 

[3]

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

#Count [2]



In our new series #count, I ask 

how many people are "like me"? 

The answer is always two fold. First, it is _none_. Second, it is "it depends." 

In what respect? is the intermediary question that _must be_ answered before one can start counting. 

Having a dishwasher? That was answered in yesterday's video by Hans, twelve years ago. 

Having read the US Constitution at 11 and having fallen in love with it, for life, in spite of the risks to life and liberty that entailed? One. Me. Because I was 11 y.o. in România and in 1976. Albeit as it turns out, you can love and recognize flaws in _something_ and want to change it to improve it, if only maybe dramatically, just the same.  

Having one's right protected by the Constitution? What about by _a_ powerful Constitution, dedicated to truly protecting human rights? _That_ is where the difficulty of real actual counting starts. Try it for yourself and see how far you can get. Suggestions on how to proceed? Write them down and see how well we can solve this simple arithmetic question.👇

Meanwhile, a good start on the learning journey, as pertaining so far to those on this land in the United States, over time, is here. Enjoy the show. It is much well worth it. If troubling, of course, as seeking truth always is. 

We thank wholeheartedly the Weitz Family Foundation, our Yates Illuminates partners, for the chance to see the show, and for bringing the show here in Omaha. A great performance. 

This series is dedicated wholeheartedly to the memory of Donald T. Campbell, and Paul Y. Hammond. Thank you.  

"Follow in the footsteps of the great.

Look inside. 

Repeat."

[2]

https://constitutionbroadway.com/

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org

New one year series #Count [1]

Hans Rosling knew how to #count. He knew what may the world need to make it nicer to more of us everywhere. 

With this, today, January 20, I start a new series here, under hashtag #️⃣ Count🧛‍♂️, for a year. It is intended to open everyone's minds as to how #numbers are all too often deceiving because we're not looking at them well enough. 

(Thanks for the idea go of course to our wannabe world changer extraordinare, CEO of Tesla Motors—whom I usually call PT Barnum of this century, because he always blows smoke and wants to sound knowledgeable about things he has no idea about, from Mars "colonization" to you name it—as an example of how ignorance grows out of proportion based on the cult followership towards the promoter.  Suffice it to say, I equate him to an irrelevant soccer ⚽️ player, as speaking in international economics or physics.)

This series is dedicated wholeheartedly to the memory of Donald T. Campbell, and Paul Y. Hammond. Thank you.  

"Follow in the footsteps of the great.

Look inside. 

Repeat."

[1]

https://youtu.be/BZoKfap4g4w

Adrian S. Petrescu, Ph.D., J.D.

Chief Future Architect, InnovationTrek

We got here. What's next?

Accelerate Innovation. 

In companies and self.

Grow flow. Naturally.

ASPetrescu@InnovationTrek.org